Here is a handy guide that will help you, disenfranchised Canadian, get engaged with and get involved in the upcoming (eventually, at the end of several more weeks of pre-election hell) federal election! The first step, as the number to the left would indicate, is to click every single link
Continue readingTag: thomas mulcair
Pushed to the Left and Loving It: Thomas Mulcair and Stephen Harper Dance to the Beat of a Shared Drummer
Someone posted a link to an interesting article yesterday, from January of this year. At the time the NDP were third in the polls and going nowhere, so the party met in the Conservative caucus room, to discuss strategy. Tom Mulcair is trying to turn around the NDP’s flagging fortunes
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: Thomas Mulcair and Stephen Harper Dance to the Beat of a Shared Drummer
Someone posted a link to an interesting article yesterday, from January of this year. At the time the NDP were third in the polls and going nowhere, so the party met in the Conservative caucus room, to discuss strategy. Tom Mulcair is trying to turn around the NDP’s flagging fortunes
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: Thomas Mulcair and Stephen Harper Dance to the Beat of a Shared Drummer
Tom Mulcair is trying to turn around the NDP’s flagging fortunes as he gears up for a federal election within nine months, shaking up his office and campaign team and stepping up his attacks on Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau.
And he contrasted that with Trudeau’s upbringing, implying that the Liberal leader was born into privilege as the eldest son of a former prime minister and believes “he can just inherit power without proposing a thing.”
“Whether it’s meeting with premiers to work on the future of our federation or with world leaders to discuss global economic opportunities or terrorist threats, being prime minister is not an entry-level job,” Mulcair said.
Revealingly, they all look backwards to 1990s Britain and to Tony Blair’s so-called “New Labour” as the appropriate recipe for a Mulcair-led NDP …
No statement has struck me as more contemporary and forward-looking than Brian Topp’s unhesitant and courageous answer to a media question on Palestine’s bid for a UN seat when he launched his own NDP leadership campaign: “We want Canada to vote with the rest of the world.”
Mulcair’s ultra-Zionist position on Palestine and the Middle East would never countenance such a possibility. On this issue, he remains solidly entrenched in his bunker with Benjamin Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman (and their friend Tony Blair, the Quartet’s very ineffectual special Mid-East envoy), while the entire Middle East is changing as people demand a future of social and economic justice and democratic participation.
Information on individual donors to Canada’s political parties, and to the NDP leadership candidates, is made publicly available at the Elections Canada website. Mulcair’s donor list is of particular interest, since he is a perceived frontrunner and because some have speculated that he would aim to move the NDP further to the right of the political spectrum, given that he was a Liberal cabinet minister in a right-wing Quebec provincial government.
What I found out about Mulcair’s donors should be of interest to NDP members and to everyone watching and covering this leadership race …
“L’Esperance also revealed in testimony that Thomas Mulcair, who resigned from Charest’s cabinet, saying he disagreed with plans to sell off the mountain, assured him last fall the government would approve his plan to build condos on 85 hectares of park land.
“It was definitely confirmed to me several times,” he told reporters. “Once by himself (Mulcair) and other times by his representatives.”
L’Esperance said that, on the strength of assurances from Alain Gaul, then Mulcair’s chief of staff, that “You have a project. Go ahead and prepare your winter season,” Mont-Orford invested another $1.5 million to $2 million for the 2005-2006 ski season.
Questioned by Mulcair, L’Esperance admitted Mulcair, at the time environment minister, raised the issue that the sale of provincial park land was illegal.”
Witnesses at National Assembly hearings are rarely sworn in but, at the request of the Parti Quebecois opposition, L’Esperance took an oath, swearing to tell the truth, before he testified.
“However, according to the Canadian Press, Mulcair had indeed approved the project Monday. The proposal would have been accepted ten days prior to the redesign of 27 February.”
“Mulcair had indeed approved the project Monday.” Ten days before he resigned after being demoted.
Now that we know that we are not only fighting two right-wingers, but also the Canadian media, we have to be diligent. Own the comments sections to set the record straight. Go after those in the media who refuse to be honest with us and out them.
Pushed to the Left and Loving It: How Bernie Sanders and Justin Trudeau Have Changed the Election Narrative
Recently, one of my favourite journalists, Rick Salutin, weighed in on Justin Trudeau’s comment, that the Liberals wanted to grow the economy “from the heart outwards”, meaning from the centre or middle class.The media and opposition parties went crazy, calling him a Care Bear, not comprehending the meaning of his words. Everyone is
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: How Bernie Sanders and Justin Trudeau Have Changed the Election Narrative
Recently, one of my favourite journalists, Rick Salutin, weighed in on Justin Trudeau’s comment, that the Liberals wanted to grow the economy “from the heart outwards”, meaning from the centre or middle class.The media and opposition parties went crazy, calling him a Care Bear, not comprehending the meaning of his words. Everyone is
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: How Bernie Sanders and Justin Trudeau Have Changed the Election Narrative
Recently, one of my favourite journalists, Rick Salutin, weighed in on Justin Trudeau’s comment, that the Liberals wanted to grow the economy “from the heart outwards”, meaning from the centre or middle class.
The media and opposition parties went crazy, calling him a Care Bear, not comprehending the meaning of his words. Everyone is looking for that sound bite, to make them look clever, when in fact, it ended up making them look foolish.
Salutin, on the other hand, did know what Justin was talking about, but preferred that it be the misinterpretation.
Why not economics from the heart instead of from the head? We’ve been led to believe that balanced budgets are the Holy Grail, and that the “Economy” is a beast we must feed or risk extinction.
Canada has become the Fisher King; the legendary figure from the days of King Arthur. Wounded in battle, he could no longer perform his duty to protect the coveted chalice, nor could he produce an heir to continue the obligation. As a result his kingdom was reduced to a barren wasteland, while the king amused himself fishing, and waiting for rescue.
The mythical Holy Grail has become a symbol for things most cherished and desired, but unfortunately, we no longer know what those things are. Salutin discusses the economic crash of 2008, that should have taught us that the current system wasn’t working. Yet things continued as before, with misguided tax cuts and mean spirited austerity measures. This election is probably the most important of a generation. We can vote for the status quo, or not vote at all, ensuring the status quo. Neither is an option.
Bernie Sanders is running for the Democratic nomination, in the run up to the presidential election, in 2016. He has become a phenomenon, primarily because he is not campaigning on lowering taxes or fighting deficits, but on the things that should matter to most Americans. And they are listening.
A liveable minimum wage, better working conditions, an end to war; to name a few. These things have not been mentioned in election campaigns for a very long time. This has forced the other candidates, vying for the job, to address the same issues, or at least promote progressive ideas.
He has changed the narrative, which has changed the issues.
Our media and politicos are too focused on Justin Trudeau’s hair, and his famous father, to listen to what he is saying. Like Sanders, he is discussing better working conditions, better wages, and benefits for veterans, seniors and children. A sensible environmental plan, and an improved relationship with provinces, so that everyone has shared goals, and can better reach them.
Stephen Harper is focused on his dubious leadership skills, while scaring us into submission, over the threat of a terrorist attack. The NDP is hoping the fact that they voted against C-51 and the Liberals didn’t, despite neither vote having an impact; will carry them through for the next two months. It won’t.
Most of their policies are the same old tired promises. More fluff than substance. A $15.00 an hour minimum wage, to create a group of “federal employees” who can be unionised; only gave false hope; and a daycare plan that won’t be implemented in this cycle or the next.
In fact, many children needing daycare today, won’t; when the first phase of their plan is rolled out, so it is not an election issue, only some vague notion, made during what Salutin calls “an intellectually threadbare era”..
We need to slay the bastard named “Economy” and create our own goals. As the thoughtful journalist says:
This kind of paradigm shift in economics — I’m calling it, after Trudeau, the economics of the heart — is probably more crucial now than it was in the heyday of what was called socialism. Then the stakes were merely misery for the masses. Now the survival of the species is at risk due to climate change and the current model doesn’t — and can’t — even take that into account. When the environment kacks out, it’s an “externality.” You carry on modelling, oblivious. It really doesn’t matter what you call it but “heart economics” sounds good to me.
Investing in Canadians is the best way to grow financially. We can’t just sit around waiting to be rescued, while our country is being reduced to a barren wasteland, and our people to a life of nothing but debt and meagre opportunities.
Sanders and Trudeau have something lacking in politicians today. Genuine compassion and the ability to inspire.
It’s risky in today’s political climate and with the state of our media, to have dreams of a better country, but Sanders and Trudeau have them anyway.
“There is only one thing that makes a dream impossible to achieve: the fear of failure.” ― Paulo Coelho
The Canadian Progressive: Jack Layton would be proud of Canadians’ growing hunger for change
Canadians’ ever-increasing hunger for changer from the dictatorial Stephen Harper regime would make the late NDP leader Jack Layton proud. The post Jack Layton would be proud of Canadians’ growing hunger for change appeared first on The Canadian Progressive.
Continue readingAccidental Deliberations: On separation anxieties
Following up on this post, let’s take a look at the first of Bob Hepburn’s theorized lines of attack against the NDP – which gets its own separate post since it needs to be analyzed in radically different ways depending on the party who launches it: Worse, the Conservatives are
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: Mulcair’s Confusing Stance on Security and C-51
Columnist Ralph Surrette had a piece in the Chronicle Herald this weekend: Harper defeat won’t suffice; this calls for fumigation In it he questions why the NDP did not go on the attack when Stephen Harper announced that he’d institute a “ban on travel by Canadians to areas of terrorist activity
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: Mulcair’s Confusing Stance on Security and C-51
Columnist Ralph Surrette had a piece in the Chronicle Herald this weekend: Harper defeat won’t suffice; this calls for fumigation In it he questions why the NDP did not go on the attack when Stephen Harper announced that he’d institute a “ban on travel by Canadians to areas of terrorist activity
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: Mulcair’s Confusing Stance on Security and C-51
After all, the arguments over the anti-terror law, Bill C-51, were still fresh — a law denounced by four former prime ministers (including a Tory one, Joe Clark), five retired chief justices of the Supreme Court, former ministers of justice and pretty well every legal expert in the country, that triggered alarm at the United Nations, that was described by both the RCMP and CSIS as “unnecessary” and that was denounced by the otherwise small-c conservative Globe and Mail as a “quasi-police state bill.” And here was Harper jerking our chains again on the same issue, proposing another broad dragnet largely outside the rule of law. What a political opportunity!
Accidental Deliberations: On guiding influences
Adam Radwanski points out in his latest column that several weeks into the election campaign, it’s hard to see what message might be used against Tom Mulcair and the NDP to any meaningful effect. But let’s note that the factors working in the NDP’s favour – and the challenges for
Continue readingAccidental Deliberations: On twisted outcomes
At the moment, plenty of Canadians are looking forward to waking up on October 20 and finding that Stephen Harper’s Conservatives have lost the election, to be replaced by a government determined by the MPs elected by voters. And we should certainly be hoping for, and working toward, that outcome.
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: Andrew Thomson’s Candidacy Exposes a Much Bigger Problem for the NDP
“My time in government, and we’ve seen the record of NDP governments — there is a strong attention to spending discipline,” he said.
“We are obviously committed to social spending, but at the same time are also committed to making sure budgets are balanced and that governments live within their means.”
It might be, if it were true. But it isn’t. According to BJ Siekierski, Thomson raided a contingency fund to give the appearance of a balanced budget.
“Are you confused about the state of the province’s finances? Uncertain whether Saskatchewan is running a) a balanced budget, b) a $500 million deficit or c)a $700 million deficit?” Bruce Johnstone, the financial editor of the Regina Leader-Post, wrote on March 24, 2007. “After this week’s provincial budget, you have every right to be confused. I certainly am and I’ve been covering these things for nearly 25 years.
“The Fiscal Stabilization Fund (FSF) was created in 2000-01 to stabilize the fiscal position of the Province from year to year and to facilitate the accomplishment of long-term objectives,” the 2007-08 budget reads.
A few days after the publication of Johnstone’s column, Brad Wall — then the leader of the Saskatchewan Party opposition — told the Saskatchewan legislature that Thomson and NDP not only failed to obtain the $75 million surplus they claimed, they also drained the FSF.
“They went from a $158 million surplus last year to a $701 million deficit this year, Mr. Speaker. They drained $500 million, a half a billion dollars, from the Fiscal Stabilization Fund,” Wall charged.
The minister’s comments have justifiably frustrated officials in these regions, especially the fact that he’s accusing them of hoarding money. If the minister wants to talk about hoarding money and replenishing reserves, he need only look in the mirror. After all, it was his NDP government that has socked away nearly $700 million dollars in its so-called rainy day Fiscal Stabilization Fund for use in the year leading up to the next provincial election. Most of this money came right from oil producing regions like South East Saskatchewan, where residents are now facing increased education property taxes all because the minister is hoarding money in his own reserves and failing to fully fund the increased costs of education.
It’s funny – Andrew Thomson didn’t bother to mention this hidden tax hike in his recent half-a-million dollar television ad campaign. Recently, a reporter asked Andrew Thomson why he had to appear in the NDP’s budget commercials. He said it was because “it’s my budget.”
Mr. Thomson, like the NDP, has forgotten something very important. It’s not his budget. It’s not even his money. That money belongs to you, the people of Saskatchewan.
Yes. He cut funding to education, so he could look good on television.
With the writing on the wall, Thomson decided not to run in the 2007 election. The NDP were thrown out of power by the Saskatchewan Party, made up of former Liberals and Conservatives. In the 2011 election, the NDP fortunes fell even further, as they were reduced to just nine seats.
Andrew Thomson has to shoulder the blame for at least some of that.
Saskatchewan NDP Shows Where the Brand Has Gone Wrong
In 2012, Journalist John W Warnock wrote a piece: Whatever Happened to the Saskatchewan NDP?
From 1944 through 2007, politics in Saskatchewan was dominated by the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and its successor the New Democratic Party (NDP). But the NDP was soundly defeated by Brad Wall’s Saskatchewan Party in 2007 and routed in 2011. Today they hold only nine seats in the legislature.
He contributes their failure, and rightly so, on their decision to move the party to the right.
Obviously, the Saskatchewan NDP needs to seriously re-evaluate the political direction it has taken since 1991. The move to the right to embrace the neoliberal model has been a failure. Thus it is a good time for a book of serious papers which examine ongoing problems and set out an alternative policy direction. The child poverty rate in Saskatchewan stands at 19.6 percent, tied with BC as the highest in Canada. James Mulvale and Kirk Englot explain how a progressive provincial government could implement a feasible strategy for poverty reduction.
The NDP had failed on every issue, from healthcare to poverty. From education to the environment.
This follows elections last year in Nova Scotia and British Columbia that were marked by the drift to the right of the NDP and electoral disappointments similar to what the party suffered in Ontario.
Their fear of Harper is too profound and they fear that the way Conservatives decimated the Liberals, now it would be the turn of the NDP to be pulverized.
Pushed to the Left and Loving It: Andrew Thomson’s Candidacy Exposes a Much Bigger Problem for the NDP
The media has been in a frenzy recently over the decision by former Saskatchewan finance minister, Andrew Thomson, to run for the NDP against Joe Oliver. According to Thomson: “My time in government, and we’ve seen the record of NDP governments — there is a strong attention to spending discipline,”
Continue readingPushed to the Left and Loving It: Andrew Thomson’s Candidacy Exposes a Much Bigger Problem for the NDP
The media has been in a frenzy recently over the decision by former Saskatchewan finance minister, Andrew Thomson, to run for the NDP against Joe Oliver. According to Thomson: “My time in government, and we’ve seen the record of NDP governments — there is a strong attention to spending discipline,”
Continue readingAccidental Deliberations: Friday Morning Links
Assorted content to end your week. – Ian Welsh rightly points out how our lives are shaped by social facts far beyond individual’s control: If you are homeless in America, know that there are five times as many empty homes as there are homeless people. If you are homeless in
Continue readingAlberta Politics: The #AngryCon: he learned those attitudes about the media from the party he supports
PHOTOS: A screen shot of the man identified by the Toronto Star as Earl Cowan at the moment he informs a reporter she’s a lying piece of … something. Below: Tory operative Fred DeLorey and Toronto Star columnist Heather Mallick. I have to confess I felt the tiniest bit of
Continue readingwRanter.com: Who will be the next big-name Jewish MP?
Last week, we examined four “Jewish” battleground ridings, including two – York Centre in Toronto and Mount Royal in Montreal – where, one way or another, a Jewish candidate is likely to win. This week, we look at Jews running for all four major parties across the country. Jews have
Continue reading