Peace, order and good government, eh?: Aaaaaand they’re off!

A favourite strategy of the Conservatives is to deflect discussion of the issues and instead try to make it look as though even an opponent’s participation in the conversation is somehow illegitimate. The best example was the focus on Michael Ignatieff’s years abroad but it’s a ploy they’ll use whenever the opportunity presents itself. It’s interesting to see the Globe and Mail doing it’s part by blasting the news that interim NDP leader Nycole Turmel was a member of the BQ for several years — as if it was a closely guarded secret that somehow implies something deeply significant. And it will be equally interesting to see how many other media players are quite happy to reinforce the frame while indulging in their favourite game: speculating about all the possible negative consequences for the opposition. It must be a slow news day. Of course, as Greg Fingas points out, the force of this shocking revelation would be somewhat blunted by the fact that prior to 2006, Turmel was deeply involved in NDP politics over a much longer period. So while the Globe story provides a brief history of her career with the PSAC, her previous association with the NDP is…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: QOTD

Tabatha Southey’s column today addresses the claim that we should run a country as if it was a household. A country’s debt can, in complete fairness, be passed along to its children, because that is exactly what happens to a country’s assets. An educated population, for example, is an asset to a country in a vast number of ways: Educated people earn more, so they pay more taxes. They tend to get sick less and go to prison less often and so they cost the state less money and, as study after study has shown, educated parents tend to raise educated children, and so education is a very solid long-term investment for a nation to make. Every time a politician makes the seemingly sensible point that everyone makes sacrifices to live within their means and therefore so must governments (as politicians from Washington to Toronto have done this week), someone needs to point out that if individuals choose to sacrifice going to university, it would be mostly a bad choice. You can make similar arguments about other kinds of investments. A government that spends money during a recession to rebuild decaying infrastructure not only creates jobs today, providing an immediate…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: Having it both ways

When the final report of the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Antisemitism was issued earlier this month, it was noted that when the group conducted hearings it chose to hear oral submissions from only 74 of the 150 individuals or groups that applied. Mario Silva, the Chair of the Coalition’s Inquiry Panel, didn’t make excuses or apologies for that: Silva said some groups that wanted to appear before the committee were comprised of people who condemned the panel’s work from the outset. "I didn’t really want to give a platform to individuals who had no time for us and so why should we have time for them?" said Silva. That doesn’t really speak to a desire to understand all points of view but since this was not an official government project and was originally presented as being privately funded — and came with a promise to reveal funding sources when the final report was issued — you could argue that they had a right to run the project the way they chose. After all, it says right on the group’s About Us page: The CPCCA is not affiliated with the Government of Canada… Which would be fair enough except for…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: Media Fail

Yesterday the Calgary Herald published the kind of story that’s become all too familiar in Canada in recent years. This time it involves a scientist working for the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Dr. Kristi Miller heads up a project created to investigate the abrupt decrease in the size of salmon stocks on the west coast and she made a discovery significant enough that when her findings were published in Science this past January, the magazine contacted over 7,400 journalists around the world to draw it to their attention. And it worked — according to the Herald "major media outlets were soon lining up to speak with Miller." And the next clause in that sentence is: but the Privy Council Office said no to the interviews. At that point the government stepped in and issued a muzzle order. The Privy Council Office also nixed a Fisheries Department news release about Miller’s study, saying the release "was not very good, focused on salmon dying and not on the new science aspect," according to documents obtained by Postmedia News under the Access to Information Act. So the dying salmon are important enough to justify a $6 million project but not important…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: Hot enough for you?

Here in southern Ontario, we’ve been having quite the heat wave. While it’s a bit more reasonable today, I don’t think it’s over just yet. And obviously southern Ontario isn’t the only jurisdiction suffering. From the Washington Post (via Chris Mooney at DeSmogBlog): Nationally, 1,966 daily high maximum temperature records have been broken or tied so far this month (through July 23). Sixty-six of those records were all-time maximum temperature records.More impressive, however, are the figures for highest minimum temperature records. Because of the extremely high humidity levels during this heat wave, a whopping 4,376 record highest minimum temperature records were broken or tied through July 23. Of those minimum temperature records, 158 were all-time records. As Mooney points out, this kind of extreme weather event is one of the easier phenomena to link to the climate change caused by GHG emissions. This is exactly what the studies suggest we can expect. And I wonder if anyone has ever done a study on the economic effect of long stretches of extreme heat and humidity. Does it have a serious effect on productivity? What are the costs associated with health related issues? How about the extra use of energy to power…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: There’s never a free speech warrior around when you need one

Quite a few in the blogosphere and the twitterstream have pointed out this post by a Canadian artist whose own government is trying to silence her and to bully others into withdrawing their sponsorship of her show. Curiously, I haven’t heard any complaint from our most stalwart and uncompromising champions of free speech like Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn. But I’m sure it’s just an oversight. Maybe they’re all on vacation, camping in the wilderness, and just haven’t heard yet. Yeah, that must be it….

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: Flattened?

Kandahar brass confident insurgents have been ‘flattened’ The commander of Canada’s last combat mission in Kandahar arrived home Friday, confident that his soldiers had "flattened" insurgents and put the troubled region on the path to stability. "Afghanistan still has its challenges but we feel that there is significant improvement in the fight against the insurgents," said Brig.-Gen. Dean Milner. "I’m guardedly optimistic that things are moving in the right direction." I would have thought a "flattened" insurgency would mean fewer violent attacks. So how to explain this report (pdf) from the Afghanistan NGO Safety Office (ANSO) which tells a somewhat different story? ANSO tracks attacks by Armed Opposition Groups (AOG) and this is from the summary and refers to all of Afghanistan, comparing the second quarter of 2011 with the same quarter in 2009: By the end of June 2011 … the Q.2 attack total has grown by 119% to a staggering 7,178 operations (p.7) or approximately 40 per day. Conflict related civilian fatalities have grown by nearly 106% over the same period, with approximately 1,856 people killed in the first six months of this year alone. Security for aid workers has inevitably deteriorated in lock-step with 73% more incidents…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: So when will they put the logos on the Legislative Assembly?

You know how big name musical acts often have specific corporations sponsoring their tours? Welcome to politics in the 21st century. Twenty-six organizations invested between $5,000 and $50,000 to sponsor the two-day premiers’ meeting in Vancouver this week. The list of sponsors include companies from the gas and oil, transportation and pharmaceutical industries. It’s claimed that corporate sponsors aren’t paying for special access and my reply to that would be: they already have special access. How else do you explain the fact that it’s corporations who have all the money but they’re the ones who keep getting their taxes cut? And even if this is just for advertising purposes, since when is government a vehicle for advertising? Why don’t they just have "Property of Exxon Mobil" stamped on their foreheads and have done with it? In politics, perception is everything. And the perception this encourages is that our elected officials are bought and paid for. On second thought, maybe I should applaud them for finally being open about it….

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: I’ll be happy to clarify that for you, Premier Wall

Saskatchewan premier Brad Wall has expressed surprise at Dalton McGuinty’s concern about tax dollars subsidizing the oil patch. As this article puts it: Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall said he was taken aback by Mr. McGuinty’s remarks, and looked forward to some clarification from him at the three-day meeting, which begins Wednesday. "I just frankly don’t understand the comment that any other part of the country has subsidized the energy sector," Mr. Wall said. "I don’t think it has ever really needed it." Apparently the premier hasn’t been paying attention. This piece is from November of last year. An independent analysis says Canadian governments are subsidizing the oil patch to the tune of about $2.8 billion a year, despite a G20 agreement to pare back such support. … In its in-depth study of Canadian supports for oil production, the [International Institute for Sustainable Development] concludes the federal government was responsible for handing over production subsidies worth $1.4 billion in 2008 — about half the total value of government relief….

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: Mostly competent government

On December 1 of this year, the federal government will implement new regulations governing the processing of refugee claims. In response to the huge backlog of claims — much of which was caused by the government’s failure to fill vacancies on the Immigration and Refugee Board in a timely way — the new regulations impose a time limit for the processing of new claims. Sounds good on the surface, right? The immigration reporter at the Toronto Star took a closer look: Ottawa’s plan to fast-track the refugee system could be a "gift" for bogus asylum seekers in the backlog because they will be on the backburner — and not fall under new regulations — when new refugee reform takes effect in December. … "The Immigration and Refugee Board will have a significant number of ‘legacy’ cases in the inventory when the Balanced Refugee Reform Act comes into force," said the board’s recently published 2011/12 planning report. "The IRB will not have the resources to resolve these cases." Critics said it is irresponsible for the government to implement a new system without a transition plan such as the "semi-amnesty" program implemented to remove a backlog before the launch of the refugee…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: Zombie lies

I think it’s safe to add this one to the list of lies that refuse to die: that Stephen Harper confounded his critics on the left by showing himself willing to embrace Keynesian economics and use government funds to stimulate the economy during an economic downturn. Today it’s Bruce Anderson in the Globe and Mail. Mr. Harper spent massively during the recession — hard to square with the idea that he’s a fiscal radical. As if Harper surveyed the situation, determined that stimulus was the right thing to do and got down to business to do it. There is no acknowledgement in this column that the economic statement that led to the creation of the (short-lived) Liberal-NDP coalition — and the controversial prorogation of parliament in late 2008 — made no mention of economic stimulus and barely acknowledged the recession. The fact that the Economic! Action! Plan! was originally born under duress keeps getting written out of the story. A few months ago it was this same paper’s editorial board indulging in historical revisionism in support of the claim that Harper’s Conservatives could be counted on to provide principled and competent economic leadership. Here it’s in support of the thesis…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: In which Angry McPointy passes the buck

Early in June it was reported that Abousfian Abdelrazik’s application for child-assistance benefits had been denied by the Quebec government because his name still appears on the UN’s 1267 terror watchlist. At the time I wondered if John Baird, freshly minted minister of foreign affairs, might get involved because the province suggested it would honour a certificate signed by the minister granting it permission to pay the benefits. Foreign affairs has now responded to Abdelrazik’s plight in much the same way it did under Lawrence Cannon: with a shrug and a "not my problem." "It is the opinion of the Department of Foreign Affairs that such a certificate is not required, as the Regulations do not prevent persons from making deposits into Mr. Abdelrazik’s account, so long as it remains frozen," the department wrote in a letter dated July 6th. So the province is free to pay the money to Abdelrazik as long as he can’t actually have access to it. His lawyer expresses confusion over this but it seems perfectly clear to me. In the face of an obvious injustice — obvious because no proof has ever been presented that Abdelrazik is guilty of any crime — the government…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: Is he running a government or making widgets?

I was born and raised in Toronto but I haven’t lived there in about 30 years, so I haven’t had anything to say thus far about the election of Rob Ford and all the controversy that has accompanied it. But I really can’t let this pass. This is Ford explaining to talk radio host John Oakley why he thinks Toronto’s labour costs are too high and there should be large reductions in staffing: In business, the first thing you look at is the labour and your labour should be making up, you know, maximum 20 per cent. Not, well, we’re at 80 per cent. It’s just unheard of. Now don’t you think that might depend on the business you’re in? If you’re manufacturing, it’s quite possible that raw materials, plant and equipment will account for 80 per cent of your costs while labour represents the other 20 per cent. And if the raw materials represent the biggest chunk of that 80 per cent, it’s entirely possible that’s the first place you should look when you’re trying to reduce costs. But if you’re running a software business, as one example, I’d suggest that 80:20 ratio doesn’t work very well. Analysis, development,…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: Standards? We don’t need no stinkin’ standards!

Sun Media pulls out of press council, citing issues with political correctness Sun Media is pulling out of the Ontario Press Council, saying it can’t adhere to the media watchdog’s "politically correct" standards. Glenn Garnett, vice-president of editorial at Sun Media, sent a letter this week saying that effective immediately the company’s newspapers are withdrawing their membership. … Garnett writes that Sun Media can’t be "bound by the interpretations" of its competitors on its journalistic obligations and objectives. I’m having a little difficulty seeing how Sun Media was "bound" by anything. This is from the the Press Council’s About page: A Press Council adjudication represents the collective opinion of a newspaper’s conduct shared by people from a broad cross-section of Ontario society and from the newspaper field. It is an opinion that the newspaper undertakes to publish, not an order that the newspaper must obey. So the burden that membership imposes is that the member newspaper agrees to report it when that broad cross-section agrees with a complaint registered about the newspaper’s reporting. So what are we talking about? A paragraph or two?…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: "the Obama administration has all but abandoned its obligations"

That’s how the Guardian’s Chris McGreal summarizes the reasoning behind the call from Human Rights Watch for foreign governments to prosecute George W. Bush — among others — for torture. The New York-based Human Rights Watch said in a report released on Tuesday that the US authorities were legally obliged to investigate the top echelons of the Bush administration over crimes such as torture, abduction and other mistreatment of prisoners. It says that the former administration’s legal team was part of the conspiracy in preparing opinions authorising abuses that they knew to have no standing in US or international law. Besides Bush, HRW names his vice-president, Dick Cheney, the former defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, and the ex-CIA director, George Tenet, as likely to be guilty of authorising torture and other crimes. The report also suggests an investigation into the roles played by Condoleezza Rice, John Ashcroft and "administration lawyers."…

Continue reading

Peace, order and good government, eh?: The adventures of Angry McPointy on the world stage

Canada continues to distinguish itself by taking principled stands on foreign policy: Canada plans to boycott the United Nations conference on disarmament to protest North Korea’s selection as conference chair, CTV News has learned. … Officials say Baird and the Conservative government are dismayed that the UN chose North Korea, which is building nuclear weapons and has threatened South Korea with military action. Except that the UN didn’t exactly choose North Korea. As the blogger at The Sixth Estate pointed out — ten days ago (emphasis in the original): …the chairmanship of the Conference rotates alphabetically. You don’t get appointed for any reason, other then that it’s your turn. Canada’s turn came a few cycles back of North Korea. The fact that Canada’s official protest was announced without mentioning the alphabetical selection process that caused it is a strong indication that Mr. Baird doesn’t have a clue what he’s talking about. And if we conclude that Baird was clueless when that statement was issued, what are we to think about CTV and Robert Fife when it’s ten days later and they haven’t picked up on this? So is Baird’s approach to foreign policy going to involve stomping his little…

Continue reading