A Brief History of “Oh So Many Years” _1_ Norah Jones and Billie Joe Armstrong (2013) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMj0JlTOwp0 starts at around 23:28, so go back. –Billie heard the Everlys’ Songs Our Daddy Taught Us, and thought, since he was rich and famous, he’d like to cover it. His wife urged Norah,
Continue readingAuthor: Dan Zorg
Zorg Report: Don Cherry Inaugurates Rob Ford in 2014
I jes wanna, jes wanna come down here and tell you kids, you kids out there, what a great guy Rob Ford is. Now, now, maybe you’re sayin’ he’s a big crack smoker. Maybe ok. But I seen this guy smokin’ crack, and lord love ‘im, he smoked crack. Heh,
Continue readingZorg Report: Don Cherry Inaugurates Rob Ford in 2014
-zr
Zorg Report: Don Cherry Inaugurates Rob Ford in 2014
I jes wanna, jes wanna come down here and tell you kids, you kids out there, what a great guy Rob Ford is. Now, now, maybe you’re sayin’ he’s a big crack smoker. Maybe ok. But I seen this guy smokin’ crack, and lord love ‘im, he smoked crack. Heh,
Continue readingZorg Report: Just Give Me 5.10.15 Minutes of Your Hate: Parsing Rob Ford’s Rage
Zorg Report: Just Give Me 5.10.15 Minutes of Your Hate: Parsing Rob Ford’s Rage
Just Give Me 5.10.15 Minutes of Your Hate: Parsing Rob Ford’s Rage Yeah, I don’t know, I thought of one of Ruth Brown’s signature R&B songs (“5.10.15 Hours of Your Love”) when I watched Rob Ford’s drunken rant video (http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2013/11/07/mayor_rob_ford_caught_in_video_rant.html). I only watched it once and I don’t
Continue readingZorg Report: Just Give Me 5.10.15 Minutes of Your Hate: Parsing Rob Ford’s Rage
Just Give Me 5.10.15 Minutes of Your Hate: Parsing Rob Ford’s Rage Yeah, I don’t know, I thought of one of Ruth Brown’s signature R&B songs (“5.10.15 Hours of Your Love”) when I watched Rob Ford’s drunken rant video (http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2013/11/07/mayor_rob_ford_caught_in_video_rant.html). I only watched it once and I don’t
Continue readingZorg Report: What Americans Do Not Understand about Healthcare
I’m sorry. The Daily Show is banned in Canada by the comedynetwork. They prevent Daily Show content from being shown in Canada. I’ll offer a link to the first part of the interview that _can_ be shown in the U.S.: http://thedailyshow.cc.com/videos/g4whw7/exclusive—charles-krauthammer-extended-interview-pt–1 For similar shows, similar websites can be consulted. The comedynetwork.ca, actually based out of Beijing, does not allow paying subscribers access to content (comedynetwork.ca observed “it was the last place in the world we could match up our initiatives with those of willing parties; we kind of like this Xi guy”)/
Zorg Report: What Americans Do Not Understand about Healthcare
What Americans Do Not Understand about Healthcare I was intrigued to watch Charles Krauthammer’s extended interview with Jon Stewart on The Daily Show the other day. Here’s the link (sorry if the link changes or whatever, but I don’t run the host site): http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/shows/thedailyshow?videoPackage=140192 (Krauthammer’s* a
Continue readingZorg Report: What Americans Do Not Understand about Healthcare
What Americans Do Not Understand about Healthcare I was intrigued to watch Charles Krauthammer’s extended interview with Jon Stewart on The Daily Show the other day. Here’s the link (sorry if the link changes or whatever, but I don’t run the host site): http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/shows/thedailyshow?videoPackage=140192I’m sorry. The Daily
Continue readingZorg Report: Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, Stands Up and Lies in the Country’s Official Political Chamber – and No-One Cares
Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, Stands Up and Lies in the Country’s Official Political Chamber – and No-One Cares What if the leader of a mature democratic country got up, routinely, in the official political forum of his/her country and lied, over and over? Wouldn’t that have consequences? Admittedly, perhaps
Continue readingZorg Report: Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, Stands Up and Lies in the Country’s Official Political Chamber – and No-One Cares
What if the leader of a mature democratic country got up, routinely, in the official political forum of his/her country and lied, over and over? Wouldn’t that have consequences? Admittedly, perhaps not in every country, since voting, like politics itself, is about prioritizing, choosing lesser evils over greater, being guided by ideology and gut sentiments, and so on. (And Canada in 2013 is clearly a different place than Canadaduring other eras, when altruism and idealism may have figured more largely than they do today.) But one simply has to believe that, in many advanced countries, the public would not tolerate a national leader who got up in the nation’s foremost political body and lied, repeatedly and without compunctions.
So the Senate scandal wends its tawdry, time-consuming, costly way. The Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, remains locked into his “deny, deny, deny” strategy, pretending—no, obviously, duh, lying—that he knew nothing about what everyone in his office—his top assistant, strategists, lawyers, party executives, communications people, etc. etc. all knew—that the government was making illegal payments to Senator Mike Duffy. He got up in the House of Parliament and said that Senator Pamela Wallin’s expense claims were just peachy, something neither the public nor the Royal Canadian Mounted Police nor auditors from Deloitte accept. All this from possibly the most controlling, calculating leader the country has ever seen. Why has this story not turned? Why are no pundits going from disbelief that they won’t state for fear of legal ramifications, to asking outright just how the Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, could be so astonishingly out of the loop that a baker’s dozen or more of his closest officials knew what he didn’t? If Harper didn’t know, then who, just who, is minding Canada’s store? Has Stephen Harper got a hobby we don’t know about? Does he do Sudoku 15 hours a day?
Buuuuut. . . so what. . . .
Let’s be honest: the “sponsorship scandal” that had such devastating consequences for the Liberal party was a tempest in a teapot. Morally and fiscally, it was penny-ante stuff compared to what the Conservatives have done. But, somehow, that “scandal” found the mean and petty streak in many Canadians. Who knows—maybe it really was a racist thing on English Canadians’ part—those Quebecois again. I hope not, but the more I try to understand it, the fewer answers I find, and the more I believe that maybe it was English racism. But the only thing that often seems to bug English Canadians more than Quebecis the thought that Quebecwould actually separate. Chretien faced a situation in which the country might break up; maybe he threw some money at it. What leader would not do the same? What leader would want to go down in history as overseeing the demise of his/her country because s/he didn’t pull out every stop to avert it? How does Stephen Harper use your hard-earned tax dollars? He uses it on blanket TV, radio, and internet ads virtually every Canadian with electricity hears numerous times every single day. This is what happens in fascist dictatorships, not democratic countries. (Besides, by slicing and dicing and gerrymandering in ludicrously corrupt ways as in Regina, Harper has avoided the issue of having to appeal to most Canadians by deciding to appeal to just 1/3 and stay in power that way.) I was never a Paul Martin supporter, but I acknowledge his achievements and ultimately believe that he did, as a public servant, have Canada’s best interests at heart and in his own mind. He didn’t need to just keep being Prime Minister, like Stephen Harper, who wouldn’t go back to being a billionaire business tycoon, like Martin, if he quit politics today. I admired Martin when he confronted the “sponsorship scandal” head-on by appointing an inquiry; I really didn’t think it was all about just getting back at the Chretien supporters (I may be Pollyanna-ish here to Liberal supporters, but I really think Martin was appealing to the Canadian public even more—misguidedly and hopefully, perhaps, but appealing to them all the same). But I also realized it was also probably political suicide, and it was. It is a terrible, terrible shame, and it says something terrible about us as Canadians that, when a leader of the very same party appoints an inquiry into corruption, we punish him by electing a government that promisesto do things differently, but then behaves arguably more corruptly than any government in Canadian history, and we keep on electing it and apparently not caring as the legacy of abuse and corruption builds and builds, seemingly almost daily. It is as if 35% of the 60-70% of Canadians who vote are saying “here, here are my tax dollars—please, please do something corrupt and venal and dishonest with them and spend them on self-promotion. But whatever you do, whether it’s helicopters or orange juice, never, ever tell me the truth, because, while I don’t mind my money being wasted, the one thing I cannot countenance is having my ideology unsettled.”
Let’s face it: Harper cannot and will not tell the truth about his work on the Duffy and Wallin and corrupt Senate appointees files. It’s sad because he pitches himself as a family man and a religious man, and so on, and all along he probably rationalizes that he’s teaching his kids what he thinks is real private-sector know-how, real realpolitik–yet really it has a simpler name, lying. Most parents do not want their kids to lie, if only for purely selfish reasons—parents don’t want to be lied to by their own offspring. Theoretically, Canadians should not want their leaders to lie to them, but so jaded and partisan have we become that we actually hug the knees of those who lie to us and use our tax dollars for their private purposes. If Stephen Harper thought he would step down any time soon, he might consider telling the truth. But Harper can’t; he has never actually had a career-based private-sector job or done any work of any kind that is not of a political nature. If he weren’t a politician, he would have to re-invent himself as someone who wasn’t, and who is taking odds on Stephen Harper re-inventing himself? Therefore, he will keep on lying, and playing the only game he knows: politics. It would be nice to think that Harper couldat least slightly tell the truth and say something like: “well, I knew some things but I had to keep the best interests of the country in mind so I made the best decision I could out of a range of bad ones.” (That’s what he initially started out trying to say—anyone remember “protect the taxpayer”?) I mean, if one regards the lengths he went to to concoct a story that he wasn’t lying, then you’d have to believe that he could kick back for a few minutes when he’s not doing handshake photo-ops with his staff and concoct a plausible story about how he waslying, but how it was really the right thing to do, under the circumstances. If, heads on their pillows, he and Laureen talk at night, surely he must do this all the time. But—and this is actually probably a huge point—Harper is probably personally incredibly stung that these people to whom he gave plum appointments and emoluments—Wallin and Duffy (what, what, what in the what would “Patrick Brazeau” ever, ever do in real life if he weren’t a senator???—or what does he do when he is a senator???) that these people who he’d showered with riches got caught acting badly. Harper probably thought: “Look, I’m giving you people a license to fleece Canadian taxpayers, so I know you’ll thank me.” When the calls from Duffy started coming in, asking for private cars and so on, Harper probably thought “Honestly, I’ve given you people enough already.” A lot of people would somewhat understand if Harper actually was honest and said that he did a bad thing but it was the best of a range of bad alternatives (though he did appoint them, he was hardly the first PM to appoint toadies). Or at least they would have, once upon a time. Once upon a time, most people would have said, “well, politics is a dirty game, and sometimes you just have to do something you know is not ideal, but it’s the best thing to do at the time.” But Harper just keeps on lying, and will keep on lying. He knows he will never be held to account, and he is creating new federal Tory ridings to assist his lying. No doubt every voter in those ridings knows that, in exchange for their votes and wasted tax dollars, they, too, will at least get a few gazebos and some roads out of the deal.
Since Harper will just keep on lying to Canadians, the opposition will never really get anywhere. Seemingly within hours of Andrew Coyne’s comments on CBC’s _At Issue_, NDP leader Thomas Mulcair adopted a serious and brief approach to questioning. As with those Canadians who would like to see their elected representatives act like adults, I was more or less in favour. The media called this, ad infinitum, a “prosecutorial” approach. Well, of course, “prosecutorial” only works if there is at least some onus on the questionee to tell the truth. Such onus does not exist in the Parliament of Canada, though it ought to be the one place in the land where it does. One almost thinks, now, that the opposition should go back to the idiotic grandstanding they always used to do, for at least that would get them in tv clips, instead of letting the media play the bland, deflective non-answers and lies of Prime Minister Stephen Harper. In the latest rotation of Harper TV supporters, we see that, for this scandal in particular, he has brought out the dyed-blonde nubiles in his caucus, some with scandals of their own—but if it’s a nubile blonde, who cares, right? If one has seen tapings of parliaments in places like Britain or Australia or New Zealand, one sees much less of the instant leaping-to-one’s-feet to applaud slavishly and juvenilely than one does in Canada. The Conservative TV caucus never ceases to amaze me in their child-like ability to sit firm and rooted and studious when THE MAN speaks, but then, the minute his shoulders soften, spring U-shaped to their feet and start grinning and clapping, tongues lolling, like kindergarten kids on sugar highs or dogs who haven’t seen their owners or food in days. These, these are supposed to be adults. If an alien saw this, an alien would surely think that the Speaker was holding a big placard that said “CLAP!!!” Honestly, if I were these Conservatives on TV, I really don’t know what I’d regret more, later in life: selfies of me doing silly things nude that I’d only imagined one or a few people might see, or actual tv clips of me rocketing out of my seat grinning like a drunken game-show winner to support a lie my grey-haired sugar-daddy had said. It is to wonder.
–zr
Zorg Report: Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, Stands Up and Lies in the Country’s Official Political Chamber – and No-One Cares
Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, Stands Up and Lies in the Country’s Official Political Chamber – and No-One Cares What if the leader of a mature democratic country got up, routinely, in the official political forum of his/her country and lied, over and over? Wouldn’t that have consequences? Admittedly, perhaps
Continue readingZorg Report: Home Alarms Killing Innocent Victims?
Joel Matlin’s Home Alarms Killing Innocent People? Having a heart-attack? A grease fire? A hard time getting up after being crushed by a vehicle whilst on your bike? Don’t worry—emergency services are on the way. Unless any of these calamities happened during a thunderstorm. Then maybe you’re gonna have to
Continue readingZorg Report: Home Alarms Killing Innocent Victims?
Joel Matlin’s Home Alarms Killing Innocent People? Having a heart-attack? A grease fire? A hard time getting up after being crushed by a vehicle whilst on your bike? Don’t worry—emergency services are on the way. Unless any of these calamities happened during a thunderstorm. Then maybe you’re gonna have to
Continue readingZorg Report: Home Alarms Killing Innocent Victims?
Having a heart-attack? A grease fire? A hard time getting up after being crushed by a vehicle whilst on your bike? Don’t worry—emergency services are on the way. Unless any of these calamities happened during a thunderstorm. Then maybe you’re gonna have to kinda tough it out for a bit.
Yes, almost any city-dweller, we’re all familiar with it. The moment there’s a thunderclap, immediately the ululating, wailing symphony of “first responders”’s sirens begins. And then, of course, anyone within earshot is instantly vulnerable, for if anyone has a real emergency, “emergency responder” staff might be just too busy, just too depleted to “respond.”
Remember when you were a kid and you heard sirens? You knew something bad might be happening. It’s one of the first unforgettable sounds most people know. Your thoughts or attitudes on hearing the sirens may change over time, but their sound never loses its urgent importance.
Or does it? Now, the minute there’s a thunderstorm, the sirens fire up, the personnel are scrambled, the slick, dangerous roads are ablaze with emergency vehicles tasked with . . . finding a way to turn off home alarms that have gone off. I’m getting so sick of this, and every time there’s a thunderclap and the sirens start up, all I can think of is of people—victims, if you like—who may be experiencing genuine emergencies as “first responders” rush to empty urban semi-detacheds or to calm and comfort distraught homeowners traumatized by having their alarm go off for no pressing reason while others, maybe, die.
Obviously, for many and variable reasons, it just isn’t in the interests of “first responders,” or governments, or home alarm peddlers to let us know just how many useless “responses” are being made, nor how “response” time during periods of atmospheric instability are being lengthened, nor how many people who, under duress from, say, a heart attack or stroke, have had their lives irrevocably altered for the worse—or worst—by delayed response times owing to squadrons of “first responders” being deployed to placid wet lawns or private business parking lots, there to congregate and mull over how to shut off the alarm. Or those who made the ultimate sacrifice, and DIED, while emergency personnel were rushing to the scene of a home alarm. I imagine there must be lots of lawsuits out there, but for now my concern is really just with the victims, as our politicians like to say. When I was a kid and I heard a siren, I just thought something bad was happening and I was a little frightened. As I aged and I heard those urgent wails, I thought of people possibly hurt or in life-threatening circumstances and a kind of vicarious empathy and concern emoted from me. Now, when it rains, I just hope to Christ someone, somewhere, isn’t really experiencing a crisis, because all the “first responders” are tearing off to pointless destinations.
And of course “first responders” will never want to take action to do something—like reducing false calls—that will be bad for business, even if it is good for public safety. One of the surest routines one can find these days are notes that crime rates are dropping, but then the exclusively right-wing media reporting and “first responders” and their Conservative government patrons stating, evidence-free, that crime is actually soaring, particularly that once unremarked but now pervasive most heinous of crime types, “unreported crime.” If you’d like citations on this, I will provide them, but I think we all know where to go to find government and “first responders” telling us that all pandemonium is breaking out when neither scholars nor statisticians nor just everyday people walking down the street can see it.
(If you’re getting sick and tired of me putting “first responders” in quotations, I am, too. But it’s my way of registering a moral objection. The “first responders” in most cases are family and friends and neighbours and passersby. They are NOT emergency personnel. There is no such thing as emergency personnel unless there is a “first responder” first—get it? And a lot of us have training and have given the blood the “first responders” use.)
3
) Of course, in many jurisdictions, any EMSresponse already comes with huge costs to the victim. Say I’m a landscaper in a remote place and my buddy has gone home for the day. I fall out of a tree and I break my arm. My arm is clearly broken, and the pain is hellacious. I know it, but I also know that if I call a paramedic, it’s going to cost me hundreds of dollars I might not have. There’s a good chance I’ll elect to get in my truck and, at danger to others, try to get to a hospital so I won’t have to confront my EMS bill a couple weeks later. Spoiler alert: the joke’s already on the landscaper, because if he parked at a hospital long enough to get his arm set, he’d probably already be out 100s of dollars. But now let’s turn to the home-alarm owners. Every time emergency personnel are called out for pointless errands when others might be suffering life-threatening crises, those home-alarm owners should be responsible for _at least_ 75% of the massive costs involved in bringing out “emergency services.”
4) Because home or business owners who use private security systems that sound off during a rainstorm and drive up EMSresponses for everyone, those owners should pay a special surtax for the pre-public protection they choose to buy, but in the end are not responsible for. Conversely, those who do not choose, or cannot choose, to buy home alarm systems and the like, should be offered a tax rebate for not drawing out, or being able to draw out, EMS pointlessly (or pointfully), and also as a kind of weak sop to them for allowing themselves to die of heart attacks and the like while EMS vigorously pursues phantom home invaders at dwellings with home alarms. Call it “victims’ rights lite.”
If the first duty of a government is to protect its citizens, then here’s an opportunity.
–zr
Zorg Report: Stampede 101 is in the books; now the cleanup will. . .never begin.
Stampede 101 is in the books; now the cleanup will. . .never begin. Say you threw a party for a million of your friends, because you knew you could rake in billions. Would you feel a slight noblesse oblige to clean up a bit afterwards, after you’d kept the
Continue readingZorg Report: A Match Made in Heaven – Loblaws and Shoppers Drug Mart Unite!!
A Match Made in Heaven – Loblaws and Shoppers Drug Mart Unite!! Shoppers kills millions of trees a week on advertising, trying to lure people to stores to buy merchandise—on sale—that Shoppers doesn’t have and, almost incontrovertibly, never did intend to have. Numerous times I got Shoppers flyers that
Continue readingZorg Report: Alberta Premier Redford Insists Elected Senators Best Way to Maximize Entitlements
Alberta Premier Redford Insists Elected Senators Best Way to Maximize Entitlements (CPC) – Speaking this past weekend to supporters and supportive media, Alberta Premier Alison Redford asserted that elected senators were the best way to ensure democratic entitlements for Conservatives. She went to particular lengths to laud Alberta’s elected senator,
Continue readingZorg Report: Preston Manning Centre Grabs the Sleaze, not the Steak
Preston Manning Centre Taking Money from Ultimate Sleazebag Cal Wenzel, as Revealed on Tape http://globalnews.ca/news/505627/exclusive-watch-the-entire-18-minute-secretly-taped-video-of-cal-wenzel-talking-to-a-meeting-of-developers/ Cal Wenzel of Shane Homes, Sleaziest Man in Calgary, dilates on friends and enemies at the Preston Manning Centre (cover, $100, 000. Now that, in Ernest, is some _grass roots_ we be talkin’.) Most people
Continue reading