Morton's Musings: Interjurisdictional immunity of highly limited application

Marine Services International Ltd. v. Ryan Estate, 2013 SCC 44 effectively eliminates the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity: Interjurisdictional immunity exists to protect the “basic, minimum and unassailable content” or the core of the “exclusive classes of subject” created by ss. 91 and 92 of theConstitution Act, 1867: Bell Canada, at p. 839.  This Court discussed

Continue reading

Morton's Musings: Abuse of process

R. v. M.T., 2013 ONCA 476: [67]       Helpful summaries of the doctrine of abuse of process are found in the recent decisions of R. v. Nixon, 2011 SCC 34, 2 S.C.R. 566 and R. v. Regan, 2002 SCC 12, 1 S.C.R. 297. Those cases identify two categories of abuse of process. The first, and more common, category

Continue reading

Laziest. Spammer. Ever!

Received in my Spam folder today: (no subject) zed1(@)iprimus.com.au 10:37 PM (8 hours ago) to Your ID was allocated 1.MILLION POUNDS in our 2013 DRAW.Send Name.   There is no creativity in this one! He/she is not doing it for the love of spamming obviously….At least all the other ones

Continue reading