Morton's Musings: Interjurisdictional immunity of highly limited application

Marine Services International Ltd. v. Ryan Estate, 2013 SCC 44 effectively eliminates the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity: Interjurisdictional immunity exists to protect the “basic, minimum and unassailable content” or the core of the “exclusive classes of subject” created by ss. 91 and 92 of theConstitution Act, 1867: Bell Canada, at p. 839.  This Court discussed

Continue reading

Morton's Musings: Abuse of process

R. v. M.T., 2013 ONCA 476: [67]       Helpful summaries of the doctrine of abuse of process are found in the recent decisions of R. v. Nixon, 2011 SCC 34, 2 S.C.R. 566 and R. v. Regan, 2002 SCC 12, 1 S.C.R. 297. Those cases identify two categories of abuse of process. The first, and more common, category

Continue reading

Laziest. Spammer. Ever!

Received in my Spam folder today: (no subject) zed1(@)iprimus.com.au 10:37 PM (8 hours ago) to Your ID was allocated 1.MILLION POUNDS in our 2013 DRAW.Send Name.   There is no creativity in this one! He/she is not doing it for the love of spamming obviously….At least all the other ones

Continue reading

Warren Kinsella: By-election Olympics

It’s superficial, of course, to always declare political “winners” and “losers” the morning after.  But people (me included) like to do it.  It’s fun. And, in electoral terms, the fact is that there always are winners and losers. Except last night in Ontario was more like the Olympics, to me.  Everyone

Continue reading