Informed on Information: Ars Technica, Wired: "The Real Internet Censors: Unaccountable ISPs?"

“…a new report suggests that nations are slowly turning ISPs into the off-duty information cops of the world. Eager to placate politicians in order to achieve their own goals (like the selective throttling of data), networks are cooperating with governments looking for easy, informal solutions to difficult problems like copyright infringement, dangerous speech, online vice, and child pornography.

Network and content providers are ostensibly engaging in “self-regulation,” but that’s a deceptive phrase, warns the European Digital Rights group. “It is not regulation — it is policing — and it is not ’self-’ because it is their consumers and not themselves that are being policed,” EDR says.”

“…Bottom line: 70 percent of the providers in the experiment took down the content without scrutinizing either it or the complainant.

All this is central to the censorship ecosystem that European Digital Rights fears, and it worries that this sort of extrajudicial censorship could get much larger in the near future. The group wants more debate “to assess the scale of the policing measures being entrusted to Internet intermediaries, the cost for the rule of law and for fundamental rights, as well as the cost for effective investigation and prosecution of serious crimes in the digital environment.””

Ars Technica, Wired – “The Real Internet Censors: Unaccountable ISPs?”

—-

Image credit: neweurasia.net – Internet censorship: Kyrgyzstan blocks independent web-sites

Continue reading

Informed on Information: New Giant Planet Hidden In Our Solar System? We Might Need A New Kind Of Planet Classification To Describe It

“There’s a giant planet right here, hiding in our solar system. One that nobody has ever seen, even while it is four times larger than Jupiter and has rings and moons orbiting it. At least, that’s what two astrophysicists say.

The name of the planet is Tyche. The scientists are John Matese and Daniel Whitmire, from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. According to them, the giant planet is hiding in the Oort Cloud—the asteroid beehive that forms the outer shell of our solar system.”

Gizmodo – The Mystery of the Giant Planet Hidden In Our Solar System

—-

“The fate of Tyche (and even if it will end up getting called Tyche) will be decided by the all powerful International Astronomical Union (IAU). They are the dudes who demoted our beloved Pluto.

The IAU will decide ‘officially’ if Tyche exists and what it will be called. There is even some conjecture that they may even make it a whole new classification of planet.”

NewsWarped.com – New planet Tyche four times bigger than Jupiter

—-

“The first tranche of data is to be released in April, and astrophysicists John Matese and Daniel Whitmire from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette think it will reveal Tyche within two years. “If it does, John and I will be doing cartwheels,” Professor Whitmire said. “And that’s not easy at our age.”

Once Tyche has been located, other telescopes could be pointed at it to confirm the discovery.

Whether it would become the new ninth planet would be decided by the International Astronomical Union (IAU). The main argument against is that Tyche probably formed around another star and was later captured by the Sun’s gravitational field. The IAU may choose to create a whole new category for Tyche, Professor Matese said.

The IAU would also have the final say about the gas giant’s name. To the Greeks, Tyche was the goddess responsible for the destiny of cities. Her name was provisionally chosen in reference to an earlier hypothesis, now largely abandoned, that the Sun might be part of a binary star system with a dim companion, tentatively called Nemesis, that was thought responsible for mass extinctions on Earth. In myth, Tyche was the good sister of Nemesis. “

The Independent – Up telescope! Search begins for giant new planet

Continue reading

Informed on Information: U.S. "House rejects measure that would extend key Patriot Act provisions through December" (for now…)

“A measure to extend key provisions of the Patriot Act counterterrorism surveillance law through December failed the House Tuesday night, with more than two-dozen Republicans bucking their party to oppose the measure.”

“The measure would have extended three key provisions of the Patriot Act that are set to expire on Monday, Feb. 28, unless Congress moves to reauthorize them. One of the provisions authorizes the FBI to continue using roving wiretaps on surveillance targets; the second allows the government to access “any tangible items,” such as library records, in the course of surveillance; and the third is a “lone wolf” provision of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorist Prevention Act that allows for the surveillance of targets who are not connected to an identified terrorist group”

“The House measure, which was sponsored by Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) and required a two-thirds majority for passage, failed on a 277-to-148 vote. Twenty-six Republicans voted with 122 Democrats to oppose the measure, while 67 Democrats voted with 210 Republicans to back it. Ten members did not vote.”

and yay Democratic Rep. Dennis Kucinich!

“”The 112th Congress began with a historic reading of the U.S. Constitution,” Kucinich said. “Will anyone subscribe to the First and Fourth Amendments tomorrow when the PATRIOT Act is up for a vote? I am hopeful that members of the Tea Party who came to Congress to defend the Constitution will join me in challenging the reauthorization.””

Washington Post – House rejects measure that would extend key Patriot Act provisions through December

—-

“Only 26 Republicans voted against the bill, and there are 52 members of the Republican Tea Party Caucus, whose chairperson, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn) voted for reauthorization along with most of the rest of her caucus. As Slate’s Dave Weigel points out, only eight of the 26 were Republican freshmen elected last November. One hundred and twenty-two Democrats voted against reauthorization, I suspect most of them just because they could.

So how did the bill fail? Basically Republicans were trying to pass the bill under “suspension of the rules,” which is considered the process for passing “noncontroversial” legislation. You need a two thirds majority of those present to pass bills that way. For one brief night, Republicans in the House learned what it was like to be a Democrat in the Senate.

Sadly, the revolt probably won’t last, as there are more than the 218 votes needed to pass reauthorization under normal procedures. What’s uncertain is whether the reauthorization will contain mild oversight provisions, and when the provisions will actually sunset.”

Washington Poat – Newsflash: Tea Party didn’t kill Patriot Act

—-

“Neither party could muster the votes needed to pass an extension of the Patriot Act, the country’s counterterrorism law. In a 277-148 vote, the House of Representatives fell a few votes short of the two-thirds majority necessary to extend several key provisions of the law.

The provisions of the act, which has been something of a legislative hot potato since it was first passed in the wake of Sept. 11, deal with roving wiretaps, granting authorities wider access to records and property during terrorism investigations, and so-called “lone wolf” provision, which approvesurveillance of suspected terrorists not linked to a specific terrorist organization.

Republican leaders said they plan to hold another vote on the measure before the end of the month.”

ABC News – The Note: Patriot Games: Congressional Leaders Blindsided By Failed Vote

My personal objections to the so-called “Patriot Act” is that it allows government agents to do almost anything they want without oversight.

For example, the U.S. authorities have been given power under the act to subpoena business records that are “relevant” to a terrorism investigation, without seeking a court warrant. I would far rather have to have them persuade a judge than to just act on their own.

No oversight, no reports, no transparency, no accountability.

Remember what happened to Stacy Bonds in that Ottawa jail cell when she theoretically had rights? When the officers knew there were cameras?

How about those school officials remotely activating webcams on kids computers while they were at home?

Or the “…nationwide database of so-called “suspicious activity reports” that describe possible evidence of terrorist attack planning. Reports will be submitted not just by state and local police and agencies within the Department of Homeland Security, but also private corporations that control economic and infrastructure assets considered high-profile targets for terrorists.”

Remember Sean Bruyea? “Sean Bruyea told CTV’s Question Period that two months after he first testified against a controversial change to veterans’ disability payments, Veterans Affairs Canada attempted to discredit him by hospitalizing him and making his advocacy a psychological issue.”

And in Bruyea’s case that was bureacrats trying to have him bundled off to a metal hospital – think about what national security types do – the about “extraordinary rendition” – that’s what they call kidnapping someone…

We all know what humans are capable of when acting without restraints.

Continue reading

Informed on Information: Ars Technica: "Sorry about that! Canada reverses metered Internet decision"

“Oops! Terrified by a critical mass of enraged broadband consumers, Canada’s government is telling its telecom regulator to rescind its approval of metered or “usage based” billing, or else. Industry Minister Tony Clement is now insisting that Canada’s Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has to undo the ruling. Most Canadian

Continue reading

Informed on Information: Ars Technica: "Sorry about that! Canada reverses metered Internet decision"

“Oops! Terrified by a critical mass of enraged broadband consumers, Canada’s government is telling its telecom regulator to rescind its approval of metered or “usage based” billing, or else. Industry Minister Tony Clement is now insisting that Canada’s Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has to undo the ruling. Most Canadian

Continue reading

Informed on Information: Ars Technica: "Sorry about that! Canada reverses metered Internet decision"

“Oops! Terrified by a critical mass of enraged broadband consumers, Canada’s government is telling its telecom regulator to rescind its approval of metered or “usage based” billing, or else. Industry Minister Tony Clement is now insisting that Canada’s Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has to undo the ruling.

Most Canadian newspapers are getting the same message from the top. The CRTC “should be under no illusion—the Prime Minister and Minister of Industry will reverse this decision unless the CRTC does it itself,” a member of Canada’s conservative government told the Toronto Star on Wednesday.

“Frankly, a decision like this is clearly not in the best interest of consumers,” the unnamed senior official added. “This is a bread-and-butter issue.””

Ars Technica – Sorry about that! Canada reverses metered Internet decision

—-

“OTTAWA—A controversial CRTC decision that effectively imposed usage-based Internet billing on small service providers will be reversed, the Toronto Star has learned.

“The CRTC should be under no illusion — the Prime Minister and minister of Industry will reverse this decision unless the CRTC does it itself,” a senior Conservative government official said Wednesday.

“If they don’t reconsider we will reverse their decision.”

The promise to reverse the ruling comes as CRTC Chair Konrad von Finckenstein is scheduled to explain the decision Thursday before the House of Commons industry committee.

While the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission is an independent agency, its decision can be overturned by cabinet. The Star was told that could happen as early as next week. “

the Star – Ottawa to reverse CRTC Internet billing decision

Continue reading