Expert Police Evidence Excluded for Lack of Independence
R. v. McManus, 2017 ONCA 188: (c) The Relevant Principles To be admitted into evidence, an expert’s opinion must be (1) logically relevant to an issue in the proceedings; (2)…
R. v. McManus, 2017 ONCA 188: (c) The Relevant Principles To be admitted into evidence, an expert’s opinion must be (1) logically relevant to an issue in the proceedings; (2)…
Moore v. Sweet, 2017 ONCA 182: This Court has made it clear on a number of occasions that lawsuits are to be decided within the boundaries of the pleadings (i.e.,…
Moore v. Sweet, 2017 ONCA 182: This Court has made it clear on a number of occasions that lawsuits are to be decided within the boundaries of the pleadings (i.e.,…
Traditionally in Canada very serious criminal cases go to trial only after they have been reviewed by a judicial officer who hears from witnesses and decides there is enough evidence…
Traditionally in Canada very serious criminal cases go to trial only after they have been reviewed by a judicial officer who hears from witnesses and decides there is enough evidence…
It is not the role of appellate courts to second‑guess the weight to be assigned to the various items of evidence. Absent palpable and overriding error — that is, absent…
It is not the role of appellate courts to second‑guess the weight to be assigned to the various items of evidence. Absent palpable and overriding error — that is, absent…
How long should a criminal case take to get heard? The Canadian Constitution provides that anyone charged with an offence is entitled to a speedy trial. The concept is that…
How long should a criminal case take to get heard? The Canadian Constitution provides that anyone charged with an offence is entitled to a speedy trial. The concept is that…
Suppose you lent money to someone for an investment. It was money that you had saved up over the years and you expected to have a decent rate of return…
Suppose you lent money to someone for an investment. It was money that you had saved up over the years and you expected to have a decent rate of return…
R. v. Mikijuk, 2017 NUCJ 02: One of these important cases is called the Queen v. Gladue . It is called that because in Canada all criminal prosecutions are done…
R. v. Mikijuk, 2017 NUCJ 02: One of these important cases is called the Queen v. Gladue . It is called that because in Canada all criminal prosecutions are done…
A very common charge is for "breach". That's a short form way of talking about a case where someone is under a court order to do something, or to not…
A very common charge is for "breach". That's a short form way of talking about a case where someone is under a court order to do something, or to not…
R. v. Holland 2017 NUCJ 03: (iii). Charter breach Analysis Society needs laws. Society also needs to be able to enforce those laws. We could not live in community without…
R. v. Holland 2017 NUCJ 03: (iii). Charter breach Analysis Society needs laws. Society also needs to be able to enforce those laws. We could not live in community without…
Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85: An additional dimension to these principles arises in defamation cases because pleadings in such actions have traditionally been…
Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. Veritas Investment Research Corporation, 2017 ONCA 85: An additional dimension to these principles arises in defamation cases because pleadings in such actions have traditionally been…
1162740 Ontario Limited v. Pingue, 2017 ONCA 52: In my view, every document or thing put to a witness or to the trial judge as a piece of evidence should…