Another Monday back in the House, with a
few notable absences – Harper, Baird and Kent among them. Nycole Turmel used
her round of questions to ask about the government’s decision to pull out of
Kyoto, and it was James Moore’s turn to be back-up PM today, where he assured
us that Kyoto didn’t work, so there was no point in sticking with it. Megan
Leslie followed up with more of the same, and Michelle Rempel was filling in
for Kent. Rempel imagined Leslie to imagine a country where 70 percent of its
energy came from non-carbon emitting sources, that in clean technology
and had a strong regulatory framework on emissions, adding “Oh, wait – that’s
Canada!” Oh, snap! Rempel should also
be commended for her ability to think on her feat and deliver answers that aren’t
directly off of fresh-from-the-PMO cue cards. Bob Rae, for his turn, began by
asking for changes to the Elections Canada act to prevent future acts of
political dirtbaggery as was directed against Irwin Cotler (Van Loan: Cotler’s
here, so really there’s nothing to see), and returned to the question of the
necessity for a “guise” for MacKay’s helicopter trip (Moore: He was using it to
get back to work from his vacation, nothing to see here – except that the
government talking points have completely abandoned the pretence that this was
a pre-arranged search-and-rescue demonstration).
Round two kicked off with Charlie Angus
asking about the situation in Attawapiskat (Duncan: The third party manager is
in place and we’re working with the government on Ontario), Peter Julian asked
about the income gap figures in the latest OECD report (Flaherty: Yay Economic
Action Plan™!), Brain Masse and Sylvain Chicoine asked about the reputed
billion-dollar price tag for the “secretive” Perimeter Security Agreement
(Obhrai: This is great for our trade relationship!), and David Christopherson
and Christine Moore returned to the question of MacKay and his helicopter ride
(MacKay: I used it to return to work!). Kirsty Duncan asked about China’s
criticism of Canada’s Kyoto position (Rempel: The Liberals had no Kyoto plan), Carolyn
Bennett asked about Chuck Strahl’s comments around Attawapiskat (Duncan: We’re working
with “willing partners,” which was a curious choice of words), and Denis
Coderre brought up Jamie Hubley and the more recent suicide of a teenaged girl
in Quebec, and wanted to know about what the government was planning on doing about
a suicide prevention strategy (Hoeppner: Bullying is bad, and we’re funding
provincial programmes to combat it, especially in Ontario). Hélène Laverdière
asked about Suncor’s operations in Syria (Obhrai: They’re using it for domestic
use like keeping the lights on in Syrian homes), and Jasbir Sandhu and
Françoise Boivin asked about the latest allegations of sexual harassment in the
RCMP (Toews: It’s unacceptable and we’re working on it).
Round three saw questions on Transportation
Safety Board recommendations for terrain warning systems, GMO crops, why we
only sent six observers to the Congo elections (Oda: That’s the maximum we were
allowed), the Perimeter Agreement, programmes for the disabled when most are
predicated on employment status, cracks in the fuselage of the F-35 fighters,
environmental reviews of the Old Harry project, and seniors’ poverty.
Sartorially speaking, snaps go out to Scott
Brison for his tailored navy blue suit with a light blue shirt and red striped
tie, and to Joyce Murray for her black jacket and skirt, with a patterned red
top and knee-high brown boots. Style citations go out to Djaouida Sella for her
shapeless leopard-print top, and to Philip Toone for a greyish-brown suit with
a too-pale orange shirt and brown tie.
