This and that for your Sunday reading. – Denise Balkissoon writes about the importance of ensuring a just transition for fossil fuel workers – ratherContinue reading
Miscellaneous material for your mid-week reading. – Andre Picard writes about the unjustifiable limitations and inconsistencies in Canada’s health care system: Break your leg andContinue reading
Assorted content to end your week. – Livia Gershon discusses why relative equality plays a far greater role in people’s well-being than absolute income inContinue reading
Assorted content to end your week. – Richard Partington writes that the poorest Britons stand to bear the brunt of the next wave of technologicalContinue reading
This and that for your Thursday reading. – Rupert Neate reports on the latest numbers showing the world’s 500 richest people adding a full trillionContinue reading
Miscellaneous material for your mid-week reading. – Eduardo Porter examines how high-end tax cuts create gains for only the wealthy few. And Lydia DePillis pointsContinue reading
Here, on how Quebec’s latest poverty plan falls far short of the “basic income” title it’s received in some national coverage – and on howContinue reading
This and that for your weekend reading. – Abacus Data has polled the Canadian public on climate change, and found far more appetite for meaningfulContinue reading
Assorted content to end your week. – Michael Paarlberg discusses how the ratchet effect is making American health care far more durable than Republicans mayContinue reading
Following up on this post, let’s take a look at Tom Parkin’s other recent post which offers plenty of food for thought. Parkin’s view broadlyContinue reading
Don MacPherson has joined the many commentators whose main take on the federal NDP’s leadership race is to zero in on how Quebec voters mightContinue reading
Miscellaneous material for your mid-week reading. – Colin Gordon discusses how contempt for democracy is one of the uniting principles of the right around theContinue reading
Miscellaneous material for your mid-week reading. – Gary Younge examines how Jeremy Corbyn and an unabashedly progressive campaign platform are making massive gains in aContinue reading
This and that for your Sunday reading. – Neil Irwin writes that many progressive policies – including child care and income tax credits – serveContinue reading
Assorted content for your weekend reading. – Ethan Cox reports on new polling showing that Canadians are highly concerned about inequality – even if ourContinue reading
Miscellaneous material for your mid-week reading. – Owen Jones writes that excessive reliance on corporate profiteers is the reason why the UK’s trains don’t runContinue reading
Assorted content to end your week. – Linda McQuaig discusses the need to fight fake news about Canada’s health care system (and the corporate raidersContinue reading
The Town of Happy Valley-Goose Bay commissioned a consultant to look at possible future development of a sand pit in a residential area of the town. You can read the report at the town website.The consultants first held a public meeting open to all tow…Continue reading
The Town of Happy Valley-Goose Bay commissioned a consultant to look at possible future development of a sand pit in a residential area of the town. You can read the report at the town website.
The consultants first held a public meeting open to all town residents. Then they tried other ways of soliciting opinions, like setting up a booth in the local mall. Then they did a survey of a sample of town residents.
Out of all that, the consultants figured out two interesting things. First, they “determined that the individuals which would most effected [sic] by the development would live within a 400-meter radius of the area of interest.” Second, they community feedback through all those means told them that 400 metres was also “the maximum distance that the average person would walk to reach a park or recreation area.”
In order to get to a place to exercise, the average resident of Happy Valley-Goose Bay would walk no more than 400 metres in order to get there. otherwise, they either wouldn’t go – presumably – or they’d pile in the truck, car, quad or whatever.
Just to put that in context for you, 400 metres is about the distance the average reasonably fit person would walk in about four minutes. And in case you hadn’t quite picked up on this, walking is a very popular form of… wait for it… exercise.
Forty-two percent of respondents to the research wanted the park for sports and recreation. “One of the most popular suggestions,” the consultants wrote, “was the development of a walking and running trail. … [This] trail be designed so that it is accessible to all age groups – with special consideration for seniors with mobility issues. There were also suggestions to include a bicycle trail which could be incorporated into the current bicycle trail system within the town.”
So there’s a major-league disconnect there between people who wanted walking trails and maybe a bike path in the park but the folks most likely to use it wouldn’t walk to the damn thing if they lived more than four-minutes’ walk away from it.
Make out of that what you want.
Here (via PressReader), on how the North Saskatchewan River oil spill may not lead directly to a needed reevaluation of the risks of pipelines – but a public expectation that we’ll shift away from dirty energy may be more significant in the long run.Fo…Continue reading